Leaving the characters aside for a bit, the novel is shrouded by class structure and political intrigue. It's a bit on the nose so the "teasing" can become a bit annoying but I don't think it's badly done.
The only thing I find that works against the setting is that there will be no significant time skip, so if you were expecting a resolution to their "romance" you're gonna wait quite a good chunk of time.īut IT MAKES SENSE, because the author takes its time to characterize and set up everything appropriately. I find this more believable than them suddenly being all lovey dovey (that would be a plot hole) the trials and tribulations they HAVE to overcome to finally be together are well pointed out and developed in the story and setting, everything is appropriately set up!. I quite liked how he teaches her, with his abilities she has being taught splendidly and the character growth is good enough, of course things are stalling, it makes sense because they are 12! It's not perfect but the author has managed to make the characters "deep enough" to move the plot forward while maintaining a theme and narrative that is interesting and entertaining. The characterizations and character progression is congruent and well portrayed in-between, they are 12, so the romance is appropriately portrayed for that age, specially considering the established world and plot progression. oh! look! and it's EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS IN THE TITLE for crying out loud.įirst of all, the worldbuilding is a bit clunky with some unfinished exposition dump that begins to be developed as the setting is expanded in the story, but it's not that bad because it serves its purpose. Yes, he IS hypocritical, what about it? he's not supposed to be a "Bastion of morality", he's there just for the sake of his Lady, to teach her and nurture her, that is CONSISTENT with his character. If you don't like the characters THAT'S FINE, that doesn't make them a "flaw on the story" or a "plot hole" This isn't a "plot hole" please refer to the definition of "plot hole" (an inconsistency in the narrative or character development of a book, film, television show, etc.) before you use the term, why is it that every time someone uses the term on their reviews they are SO wrong? is that the only writing term you know?. I guess they are used to the MC without personality all this F'n Japanese authors use.Īnyway, yeah, this MC haves a very clear and distinct personality, he's teaching modern common sense while maintaining the moral standards of the era. I find it hilarious that people call "Character Traits", "Plot holes" and "Flaws in the story". Otomega or ReVillain all routes lead to death flag much better or falling in love with villaineous (the author stole plot from this novel prob) <
Yes they will never allow a young butler to go close to their young daughter.
This novel had good plot but basically it throws the reason and common sense out of the window.Īuthor doesn't know about the european monoarchy nor that the treatment of their heirs, who can approch their daughters.
0 kommentar(er)
